Rengoku Vs Akaza Demon Slayer Gameograf
gfgopigkkjcinmgoancipefafljdfghd
Risk Score
5.27
Risk Level:
Medium
Recommendation:
🟡 MEDIUM RISK — review
Top Risks
- Privacy policy URL returns HTTP error — policy effectively unavailable, treated as no policy.
- NewTab override with install/uninstall URL hijacks and operator cluster of 20+ siblings — monetization shell pattern.
- Uninstall URL hijack redirects to gameograf.com with UTM tracking params.
- Two innerHTML DOM-XSS sinks with no CSP, amplifying XSS risk from API responses.
- Operator cluster: 20 extensions share same dev email; classic game-portal fan-content shell pattern.
Evidence
- privacy_policy_fetch_failed api privacy_policy_classification.fetched==false (HTTPError); scored as no policy → Privacy +10.0.
- uninstall_url_hijack crx chrome.runtime.setUninstallURL to gameograf.com with UTM params → Webstore +3.0.
- install_url_hijack crx onInstalled opens gameograf.com with UTM params → Webstore +2.0.
- newtab_override manifest chrome_url_overrides.newtab set → Webstore +2.0 new-tab monetization shape.
- operator_cluster api sibling_count=3 compound; dev_email cluster=20 siblings → Webstore +2.5.
- dom_sink_innerhtml_userctrl crx Two innerHTML sinks in popup.js and calendar.js; no CSP → Code Quality +2.0 each trigger.
- no_developer_name store developer_name is empty string → Reputation +1.0.
- verified_publisher store verified_publisher=true → Reputation -3.0 (capped at -1.0 per 0c: monetization pattern detected).
Permissions Breakdown
- search medium Allows overriding default search provider; medium risk for a NewTab extension.
- host_permissions: https://api.gameograf.com/* low Scoped to developer-controlled API domain only.
- chrome_url_overrides.newtab medium Replaces new-tab page — primary monetization/data-collection surface for this category.
Pillar Scores
Permissions3.00
Reputation4.50
Network2.00
Webstore8.00
Maintenance3.50
Privacy10.00
Code Quality2.00
CVE Exposure0.00
Operator Siblings (15)
Other extensions sharing this developer's compound fingerprint:
- kbbpgbdclanolnidddbeolaaddllgebp
- kgdahhodabbdnkkphjpneoiadhdphhna
- dihbfoicmibapnfojehonedckdjhegbe
- cdmooeifaodbcailnibfpnmbighehpkj
- pjbnoadhjobchdjkfhpehlbigakbjfii
- iobnmhnecelingbpdadgpmalbdagjbnb
- jpmpdfcaaelghoomjgdebmoekdfkhabp
- ohpdpicjlgbpihginhijhkfdcgfbffgf
- cifonlmfhnimmghojdepepjdgbbminel
- dbomdodikcfpocimcpegpbnlmankljcb
- dmdfahkplmikmlboodadelolcmbjgmff
- ckodcbbdgmpjidpfcipfobfagemmfapi
- kbolkhdnpodncbepmdejjijgkdpedgcj
- gfbhidjkgiaopiekkefehamhcmigdcna
- ekmpmfdhakdjaaifkfgpbcagdhlbamki
Bookkeeping
Rubric v3.6
Scored at 2026-09-15 15:04
Listing SHA
0482ac930ae7…
Force block
— not fired
Score recovered
no
Elapsed
—